General information | |||
TC033066 | Gene
The sequence from the iB fragment is matched against the genes from the official gene set. The matche(s) is/are visualizied in a genome browser. |
NC_007420.3: 5215543..5221398 | |
Sequence information | |||
Transcripts / Proteins (1) | Get mRNA sequence
Get CDS sequence Get protein sequence |
||
Ortholog information (from OrthoDB)
The information about the homolog genes in Drosophila
is provided by OrthoDB http://www.orthodb.org/.
The homologs are sorted according to their similarity score. For an orthology statement additional
analysis are required. | |||
Closest fly homologs |
|
TC033066 |
GO terms for Tribolium
-
{{ goTerm.term }} ({{ goTerm.evidence }}){{ goTerm.evidenceTooltip }}{{goTerm.showAll ? '[-]' : '[+]'}}Status: {{ goTerm.status }}
Evidence: {{ goTerm.evidence }} ({{ goTerm.evidenceTooltip }})
Reference: {{ goTerm.referenceText }}
Quotation: {{ goTerm.quotation }}
Submitter: {{ goTerm.name }}
There are no GO terms for Tribolium at the moment. You can help the community by providing some GO terms for this gene.
GO terms for the homologous Drosophila genes
Assign a GO term to this Tribolium gene by filling in the fields. Repeat to add several GO terms. Search AmiGO for the correct GO ID. Use only the most specific term - use "graph views" to browse related terms ("child terms" are more specific; the more general "parent" terms will be automatically linked). Only information based on Tribolium data should be entered - do not define terms just based on Drosophila knowledge. We will review this information and submit the annotation to the Gene Ontology consortium.
Gene | {{ goGene }} |
|
---|---|---|
GO ID | * {{ blurIdResult }} |
|
Evidence | {{ blurEvidenceResult }} |
|
Reference | * {{ blurReferenceResult }} |
|
Quotation | ||
Name | ||
Publish name | ||
{{ unavailableText }} |
* : mandatory fields
Attention! iBeetle is a first pass screen. Hence, the documented phenotypes need to be confirmed by independent experiments using non-overlapping dsRNA fragments! Phenotypes with a penetrance > 50% are frequently reproduced. See Schmitt-Engel et al. 2015 for details on reproducibility.
General information | ||||
iB_09069 | iB fragment
The sequence from the iB fragment is matched against the genes from the official gene set. The matche(s) is/are visualizied in a genome browser. |
Get FastA Get primers |
Pupal injection procedure
Day 0: 10 female pupae of the pBA19 strain (muscle enhancer trap line) were injected with dsRNA.
3 days post injection (dpi): Hatch control: Pupal and adult lethality as well as metamorphosis defects (molting, eclosion) were documented. For mating, 4 males of the black strain were added.
9 dpi: First egg-lay was collected and incubated for cuticle analysis. Adult lethality and egg production (reduced/ no egg-lay) was documented.
11 dpi: Second egg-lay was collected and incubated for embryonic muscle analysis. Adult lethality and egg production (reduced/ no egg-lay) were documented.
Note: The adult morphology was not analyzed systematically at 3/9/11 dpi. Only obvious phenotypes, visible without magnification, have been annotated.
13 dpi: Egg productivity and Ovary analysis
The percentage of hatched larvae was documented and not hatched larvae/ eggs were embedded for cuticle analysis (15 dpi).
In case of a reduction of egg production, 4 injected females were dissected to analyze the gross morphology of the ovaries.
14 dpi: Analysis of embryonic musculature and early embryonic development
Offspring of the injected females (hatched and not hatched larvae/ eggs) were analysed for embryonic lethality and muscle defects.
15 dpi: Analysis of larval instar 1 cuticle
Offspring of injected females were analysed and cuticle phenotypes were annotated.
22 dpi: Stink gland analysis
Documentation of defects in abdominal and thoracic stink glands (colour, size, content) of the injected femals.
Terms used in the pupal injection procedure
- larval pantagmatic defects
- At least two tagmata (head, thorax, abdomen or terminus) show similar/ comparable defects.
- empty eggs
- Just empty shells are visible, no cuticle has been developed.
- strong defects
- L1 cuticle larvae which show severe defects. These strong defects are subdivided into three categories
- strongly fragmented (cuticle crumbs)
- No segments or appendages are identifiable, only residues of cuticle and bristles can be identified.
- cuticle remnants (with unidentifiable segments)
- Segments or parts of appendages are recognizable, but identity is not clear.
- cuticle remnants (with some identifiable segments)
- At least one segment or appendage is clearly regonizable.
- number of eggs on slide
- affected embryos usually (not always) do not hatch. Only the not hatched were used for cuticle analysis.
For the embryonic muscle analysis the hatched as well as the not hatched were analysed. - total number of affected eggs/embryos/larvae
- Summary of all different phenotypes/ phenotypic series which were annotated.
- inside-out
- The L1 larva shows a partial or complete inversion., e.g. bristles, appendages or parts of the abdominal segments are inverted into the interior of the cuticle.
- starved
- Dissected females show a strong resorption of fatbody predominately in the abdomen and the oogenesis is blocked. These are considered as eventually lethal phenotypes and the blocked oogenesis probably a secondary defect due to starvation.
- eclosion not fulfilled
- The emergence of the adult from the pupa stage is interrupted. This phenotype shows pupal as well as adult features.
Lethality 11 days after pupal injection: 30.0% (includes death as pupa, adult)
eclosion not fulfilled (with pupal and adult features) - Number of animals showing the phenotype: 3 (3 dpi)larval musculature pattern irregular - Penetrance (percentage of animals/eggs on slide): less than 30%
affected eggs/embryos/larvae - Penetrance (percentage of animals/eggs on slide): 50% - 80%
remarks: muscle pattern potentially obscured by segmentation defect,
embryo/egg without visible larval cuticle in cuticle preparation - Penetrance (percentage of animals/eggs on slide): 50% - 80%
cuticle remnants with some identifiable segments - Penetrance (percentage of animals/eggs on slide): less than 30%
larva random shape irregular - Penetrance (percentage of animals/eggs on slide): less than 30%
affected eggs/embryos/larvae - Penetrance (percentage of animals/eggs on slide): more than 80%
Larval injection procedure
Day 0: 10 female L5-6 larvae of the D17Xhom strain (females express RFP in the eyes and in the CNS; pupae express GFP in the thorax) were injected with dsRNA.
11 days post injection (dpi): Pupal morphology Documentation of larval/ pupal death and defects of metamorphosis (eclosion, delayed development). Screening for alterations of pupal head and appendages, pupal thorax, pupal thoracic musculature, pupal legs, pupal wings, pupal abdomen and pupal genital lobes.
16 dpi: Adult morphology Documentation of larval/ pupal and adult death and defects of metamorphosis (eclosion, delayed development). Screening for alterations of adult head and appendages, adult thorax, adult elytra and hindwings, adult legs and cuticle properties. For mating 4 males of the black strain were added.
19 dpi: Sieving and egg-lay Documentation of adult lethality and enduring metamorphosis defects.
22 dpi: Ovary analysis (Fertility) In case of a reduction of egg production 4 females were dissected and the gross morphology of the ovaries were analysed.
41 dpi: Fertility and stink gland analysis Documentation of defects in abdominal and thoracic stink glands development (colour, size, content) of the injected females. Check for fertility of injected larvae (no or decreased offspring).
Terms used in the larval injection procedure
- pupal/ adult pantagmatic defects
- At least two tagmata (head, thorax, abdomen or terminus) show similar/ comparable defects.
- pupal molt not fulfilled
- The hatching from the larva to the pupa is interrupted. Either it dies as prepupa or the phenotype shows larval as well as pupal features.
- eclosion not fulfilled
- The emergence of the adult from the pupa stage is interrupted. This phenotype shows pupal as well as adult features.
- starved
- Dissected females show a strong resorption of fatbody predominately in the abdomen and the oogenesis is blocked. These are considered as eventually lethal phenotypes and the blocked oogenesis probably a secondary defect due to starvation.
Lethalities 11 days after larval injection: % (includes death as larva, prepupa, pupa)
Lethalities 22 days after larval injection: % (includes death as larva, prepupa, pupa, adult)
- >TC033066 RA
MTAPSRLDP SCTTLTKFI FAEENRIWQ STGELTRLL NSIQMATKS VSALVRRGG VSHLFTHAI GKQKETKRK AIANEIFIN MLISSYSVG VIVSEENPK PLEVDRDHR GKYIVAIDP LEGLPDVDC NTAIGSIFL ILDKGDDNL PTAQDVLFE DNQITAAGY ALYGSATTL VMSTGEGVN SFVLDTEIG EYIMTESNL KMPKKGNTY SINEGYTSS WDDLVKNYV NAKKFPHSG KPYTARYVG SMVADIHRT LKHGGIFMY PANKEHPHG KLKLLYECK PMAFIIEQA GGLSTDGTR SILDVKPRE VHQTTPIFL GSTNDVREF LGLASKSVR SLQ
- >TC033066 RA
atgactgca ccttcgcgc ctagacccc agttgtaca actctcaca aagtttatc ttcgccgaa gagaatcgc atctggcag tccactggc gaactcacg agactcctc aattccatt caaatggcc accaagtcg gtcagtgcc ttggttagg aggggcggt gtgtcccat ttgttcacc cacgccatc ggaaaacag aaagaaacg aaaagaaaa gccatcgct aacgaaatt ttcatcaac atgctcata tcgtcgtat tctgttggt gtgatagtg tcggaggaa aacccgaag cctctggaa gtcgataga gaccacaga ggcaagtac attgttgcc attgaccct ctggaaggt ctcccagac gttgactgt aacactgca atcggttcg attttccta atactggac aaaggcgat gacaatctg ccaacggct caagacgtc ctgttcgaa gacaaccaa atcactgct gcaggatac gcgctgtac gggagtgcc acaactttg gtcatgtca acaggagaa ggagtcaac tcttttgtc cttgatacg gaaatcgga gagtacatc atgaccgaa agtaatttg aagatgccg aagaaaggc aatacctat tccattaac gaaggttat acctcctct tgggacgat ttagttaag aattatgtg aatgctaag aaattccct cattcgggg aaaccctac actgccagg tatgtcggt tccatggtt gccgacata cacaggact ttgaaacac ggaggcatt tttatgtac ccagctaac aaggagcac cctcatggc aaattaaaa ttactgtac gagtgcaag cccatggcg ttcatcata gaacaagct ggtgggctt tctacggac gggacgcga agtatcctg gatgttaaa ccaagagag gtccatcag acaactccg atttttttg gggtcgacc aacgatgtc cgggaattt ctagggtta gcgtctaag agtgtcaga agtcttcaa taa
- >TC033066 RA
cgccgatgc cccagcgcc ttccgctga tcacgttgc cacacgtgt gatacgcga tcttctgcc taagaccaa aaaggcaaa tttatcatc agaagactt gatagctgt cggcttact tttaattga tggtgtgcc aaacagccg agtcatcgg cagaaggtt ggagtttca cacctaccc ataatctaa ccgtaacca gaacaactc atcacactg tttggtact tatttagat cgaggaggt gatacgcac gggacggct cgggaatgt cgtatcatc gggagtaat ttcatggcg aaaaaggag cctggctag gattattgt tactggcga gatgcactt gcgattttt accgctgga cgacatctg tcacactgc atacggctt tctaacaga aagtgtgta atttgattg accatatta tgtttgcat atggtaata atgcaactt tgaaataac tgtttcgag acgtgtggt taaaggacg tccatgtgg cctattata aggctaact gaatcaaga ttccgcatt tcaaacgtc aaaatgact gcaccttcg cgcctagac cccagttgt acaactctc acaaagttt atcttcgcc gaagagaat cgcatctgg cagtccact ggcgaactc acgagactc ctcaattcc attcaaatg gccaccaag tcggtcagt gccttggtt aggaggggc ggtgtgtcc catttgttc acccacgcc atcggaaaa cagaaagaa acgaaaaga aaagccatc gctaacgaa attttcatc aacatgctc atatcgtcg tattctgtt ggtgtgata gtgtcggag gaaaacccg aagcctctg gaagtcgat agagaccac agaggcaag tacattgtt gccattgac cctctggaa ggtctccca gacgttgac tgtaacact gcaatcggt tcgattttc ctaatactg gacaaaggc gatgacaat ctgccaacg gctcaagac gtcctgttc gaagacaac caaatcact gctgcagga tacgcgctg tacgggagt gccacaact ttggtcatg tcaacagga gaaggagtc aactctttt gtccttgat acggaaatc ggagagtac atcatgacc gaaagtaat ttgaagatg ccgaagaaa ggcaatacc tattccatt aacgaaggt tatacctcc tcttgggac gatttagtt aagaattat gtgaatgct aagaaattc cctcattcg gggaaaccc tacactgcc aggtatgtc ggttccatg gttgccgac atacacagg actttgaaa cacggaggc atttttatg tacccagct aacaaggag caccctcat ggcaaatta aaattactg tacgagtgc aagcccatg gcgttcatc atagaacaa gctggtggg ctttctacg gacgggacg cgaagtatc ctggatgtt aaaccaaga gaggtccat cagacaact ccgattttt ttggggtcg accaacgat gtccgggaa tttctaggg ttagcgtct aagagtgtc agaagtctt caataaaac gtaacgaag ttaattcta aaagaacta ttttcccct aattgaaaa aatgcccaa cctagtggt cctgtcaat tcgtatatg gtacacatt attaacaaa tcgttgatt ccaaacgca ctcaaccga taaaccaca ctggggttt tgcactctc atcaccacc atttccaaa tgttcaatt aaaaacttg tccggtgt
If you use iBeetle-Base, please cite: Dönitz J et al.: Expanded and updated data and a query pipeline for iBeetle-Base,
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D831-D835. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx984.
